|
|
How do your cells know what time it is? Answer:
Telomeres
First, what is a telomere:
Telomeres
are sequences at the ends of chromosomes. Though they are written in the 'alphabet' of the genes, telomeres do not
contain the codes for proteins. So telomeres are not themselves genes, but neither are they meaningless junk. Instead these
repetitive sequences protect the ends of the chromosome from damage, and prevent the chromosomes from fusing into rings, or
binding haphazardly to other DNA in the cell nucleus.
When a cell divides, the chromosomes are copied by enzyme
molecules. These molecules faithfully transcribe the genetic information on each chromosome, producing mirror images of both
of the two original strands (which themselves were mirror images of each other). But the enzyme molecules that do the duplicating
are unable to completely reproduce the tips of the chromosomes, much as a tape recorder can not play the last few centimeters
of tape in a cassette. As a result, the duplicate chromosome is necessarily slightly shorter than the original, lacking a
small amount of the original telomere sequence. The missing DNA does not measurably affect cellular functioning until enough
cell divisions have occurred that the telomeres on at least one of the chromosomes in the cell become critically short. no Cells with critically short telomeres alter their character by transcribing a partly distinct set of genes. They
also become unresponsive to triggers that would normally stimulate them to divide. Though these growth arrested cells can
live on in the body for years, once they have reached this state, they do t under normal circumstances, replicate themselves.
They are said to have reached their Hayflick limit (named for the discoverer of the arrested state).
Telemerase:
there are a number of mechanisms in nature that
counteract the natural tendency of telomeres to erode over time. Vertebrates, including mammals, use a remarkable enzyme dubbed
'telomerase'. This hybrid molecule, part protein, part RNA, is capable of slowing telomere erosion, halting erosion
altogether, or lengthening telomeres beyond those in the parent cell. The genes that produce telomerase are found in every
potentially replicating cell in the body Source: http://www.telomere.net
Sensence:
Though the connection is still controversial,
many biologists believe that the senescent decline observed in mammals is the result of an ever increasing percentage of cells
across the body reaching their Hayflick limits. Clearly, if an ever larger percentage of the body's cells are unable to
reproduce, then defense, maintenance and repair of the body would become increasingly difficult tasks. Thus, telomere erosion
and Hayflick limits could account for most of the decline in efficiency, and increases in vulnerability that characterizes
the aging of sexually mature mammals.
The evidence supporting this perspective has grown substantially in the
last few years of research. Further, the discovery that several diseases that produce syndromes of apparently accelerated
aging in humans (e.g. Hutchinson-Gilford progeria and Werner's syndrome) have now been linked to telomere-system defects,
strongly suggest that this mechanism is fundamental to the explanation of aging in humans
http://www.telomere.net
Sensence:
Though the connection is still controversial, many biologists believe that the senescent decline observed
in mammals is the result of an ever increasing percentage of cells across the body reaching their Hayflick limits. Clearly,
if an ever larger percentage of the body's cells are unable to reproduce, then defense, maintenance and repair of the
body would become increasingly difficult tasks. Thus, telomere erosion and Hayflick limits could account for most of the decline
in efficiency, and increases in vulnerability that characterizes the aging of sexually mature mammals.
The evidence
supporting this perspective has grown substantially in the last few years of research. Further, the discovery that several
diseases that produce syndromes of apparently accelerated aging in humans (e.g. Hutchinson-Gilford progeria and Werner's
syndrome) have now been linked to telomere-system defects, strongly suggest that this mechanism is fundamental to the explanation
of aging in humans
http://www.telomere.net
Sensence:
Though the connection is still controversial, many
biologists believe that the senescent decline observed in mammals is the result of an ever increasing percentage of cells
across the body reaching their Hayflick limits. Clearly, if an ever larger percentage of the body's cells are unable to
reproduce, then defense, maintenance and repair of the body would become increasingly difficult tasks. Thus, telomere erosion
and Hayflick limits could account for most of the decline in efficiency, and increases in vulnerability that characterizes
the aging of sexually mature mammals.
The evidence supporting this perspective has grown substantially in the
last few years of research. Further, the discovery that several diseases that produce syndromes of apparently accelerated
aging in humans (e.g. Hutchinson-Gilford progeria and Werner's syndrome) have now been linked to telomere-system defects,
strongly suggest that this mechanism is fundamental to the explanation of aging in humans

This is the home page.
Enter subhead content here
|
|
Telomeres: Telomeres
(tē•lo•meres) are buffers, protective pieces of DNA at the ends of each and every chromosome in every cell
in the body. Telomeres are the cellular clock of aging, every time a cell divides, telomeres get shorter. When telomeres get
too short, cells can no longer divide and proliferate; they become old cells. Maintaining telomere length allows cells to
continue to divide and proliferate for a longer time; they simply live and function longer. http://ouroboros.wordpress.com/2007/09/28/telomeres-and-aging-justifying-what-the-ends-mean/ September
28, 2007 Posted
by ouroboros under Biomarkers, Telomeres [2] Comments More evidence of telomere length as a biomarker of aging emerges from a study of “exceptionally old persons” (subjects >90 years old): Peripheral blood
leukocytes from very old individuals show telomere lengths that are about what you’d expect based on extrapolation from
the steady decline in length between youth and regular (as opposed to “exceptional”) old age. The very aged also
show an enrichment in what the authors call “ultra-short telomeres”; I suspect this peak in the histogram can
be rationalized by the fact that telomere lengths are bounded below by zero, such that steady linear decline in length over
time would result in a pileup in the “undetectable” category. Is telomere length important to the mechanism
of aging, in addition to being a marker of advanced chronological age? The jury is still out on that, likely frustrated by
the circumstantial nature of the evidence. We know that telomere length appears to be inversely proportional to life expectancy, but of course correlation ≠ causation, and lifespan and telomere
length could be unrelated signifiers of the same underlying phenomenon. To complicate the issue, we are reminded in a recent
review that all telomere ends are not equal: In addition, recent
studies in both normal and pathological contexts point to the existence of chromosome-specific mechanisms of telomere length
regulation determining a telomere length profile, which is inherited and maintained throughout life. …i.e., bulk
telomere length might be less important than the lengths of particular telomeres, a forest hiding the most significant trees.
More to the point, the telomere lengths of the various chromosomes might be regulated independently, making bulk telomere
length something of a red herring. In the cellular senescence field, the idea of “sentinel telomeres” is still alive and kicking, but hardly ascendant.
The emerging consensus is that a specific group of chromosomes with the shortest telomeres in a given clonal lineage,
rather than a single sentinel telomere, herald the onset of senescent cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, where senescence is
concerned, it is likely that end-to-end joining between “signal-free ends” (probably the same as the “ultra-short
telomeres” discussed above) are more relevant than bulk telomere shortening. I mention this not to argue one way or
the other about the relative importance of individual vs. population lengths as related to telomeres as a biomarker of aging,
but rather to give a cautionary example of a situation in which the easiest measurement to make (the distribution of lengths
in a population) doesn’t appear to be the most relevant.
Enter secondary content here
|
|